Why does the covid-19 vaxx have short "protection"?
"Regarding the respiratory pathogens, the immune systemic response is triggered in the gut by the Peyer's Patches" Professor Emeritus Robert Clancy
John Campbell published an interview on youtube (← link) with a pioneering clinical immunologist, Professor Emeritus Dr. Robert Clancy. In case youtube takes down the video, this is another link (← link).
Even if John Campbell is pro-vaxx, even he interrupted Professor Clancy several times at key points, even if John Campbell did not have the courage to state the obvious about the covid-19 vaxx, it is very appreciative that John Campbell published this interview.
I was looking for an answer to this question for some time: Why has the covid-19 vaxx short duration ‘protection’, for only couple of months? (← link) A list of questions regarding covid-19 short duration ‘immunity’ is here (← link).
The interview with Professor Clancy enlightens about our immune system’s action mechanism. There’s a couple of parts for understanding respiratory pathogens immunity response, but still the interview is the best for this understanding. So watch the interview. I’ll list here a very short summary of my (amateurish) understanding:
The systemic immunology is slightly different than the mucous immunology. “The mucous immunology needs a down-regulation mechanism, mechanism of suppression, otherwise the body would be blow up with inflammatory response to all the bacteria and viruses” (it comes in contact with).
But regardless of the immune system, systemic or mucous, “when you stimulate immunity, you're actually stimulating protection, suppression, facilitation of infection and auto immune responses against white proteins represented through the body, and it's the balance between these ones that it's giving you” the defense mechanism against pathogens.
The mucus takes the airways pathogens to the guts. And there, a systemic immune response (antibodies in the form of B cells or T cells or …) is triggered with the help of Peyer’s Patches (← link). The Peyer’s Patches know what type of immune response to create.
In case of covid-19 (respiratory disease), the immune response created by the Peyer’s Patches know to send the antibodies to the mucous membranes and to the lungs too. (It’s simply amazing how smart the immune system is, as it knows that lungs are the organs to be protected too.)
The systemic immune system (a sterile environment) has two parts: innate (build-in) and adaptive. Many people focus on the systemic immunology.
Now, a covid-19 vaccine stimulates a systemic immune response by the adaptive system (other lymph nodes and NOT the Peyer’s Patches).
But, as Professor Clancy explains, the gut regulates (control) the immune response in case of respiratory pathogens.
Covid-19 is an infection of the mucous surface and it should be kept there. The early treatment is the KEY, to keep covid-19 in the upper respiratory airways and not let it getting into the lungs.
With this basic understanding, it seems that:
The mRNA or adeno-virus DNA vaccines target the wrong part of the immune system (a fundamental flaw). A covid-19 vaccine stimulates other lymph nodes, when the Peyer’s Patches in the gut regulates the body immune response for airborne pathogens.
The covid-19 vaccine stimulates the wrong response of the immune system, stimulates the T helper cells rather than the T suppression cells.
It looks like the body doesn’t get a chance to learn a proper immune response from a covid-19 vaccine (as the wrong part of the immune system is targeted by the vaccine and T helper cells are stimulated)
The body sees a covid-19 vaccine, or the effect of it in the form of the spike protein, and mounts an immune response, in the form of T helper cell antibodies.
When the spike protein is removed from the body, or when the immune system becomes fatigued, the antibodies are not produced anymore or the wrong antibodies are produced more then needed.
It might be that when somebody gets in contact with the sars-cov-2 during this short ‘protection’ time, and when the immune system is overly active (normal, as it is a big inflammation in the body, generated by the vaxx spike protein), and there is no, or a low sar-cov-2 virus load, the serious consequences of the covid-19 are suppressed. But the suppression is not an effect of the vaccine, it is a strong immune response of a healthy individual.
WE KNOW A HEALTHY individual is ok even with a high virus load without a covid-19 vaccine.
If true, it’s mind blowing. The covid-19 vaccines have design flaws of unimaginable proportions. They can NOT work to offer protection against covid-19 AND if too many covid-19 vaccines are taken in a short time, it can produce AIDS type disease.
Additional quotes form Professor Clancy’s interview:
Regarding the medical science and covid-19:
“This is not rocket science, it is not new. Our understanding is 80 or 90 years old“
“Vaccination is a sloppy science. Because there are so many variables and it’s empirical. Some of the best vaccines are some of the crudest vaccines” (I guess the ‘crudest vaccines’ are the best because they match a natural response)
34:00 "Need to move towards spacing of vaccines, so we do not accumulate, what downstream can be incredible damaging, if we turn off we basically make coronavirus like aids or something like this"
“The greater the virus load, the greater the chance of getting significant infection”
“Lower we get the virus load by early treatment, better”
“Omicron is a mutant variant that has less capacity to escape from the mucous compartment”
“We know that the natural immunity is better that the immunity that follows a vaccine“
“It is all about the mucous tolerance, the down-regulation, that you stimulate a positive, you stimulate a negative and the balance determines what you see”
“The genetic vaccines produce unregulated amount of antigen in the body, we have no idea how much. We have absolutely no idea how much antigen we have in the body, what it's doing to our immune response” (we know though the negatives, the short duration ‘protection’ and the adverse reactions)
Regarding lock-downs:
“We've got a delayed response here, we had a sort of pretty rigorous process here and it's been very destructive economically and psychologically”
Regarding the decision makers:
“The decision makers, do not have people that really know immunology”
“We need to use wide spread early treatments, we know how effective they are, we're not getting this info transfer to the decision makers”
“We need to look at plan B, we need to do it scientifically” (it means that the plan A with the vaxx does not work)
Excellent! You should reference it from time to time.